Every statistic, policy claim, and competitor price we cite across the Tack Tools blog traces to a primary source listed below. If you spot something that looks wrong or outdated, email editorial@tacktoolspro.com — we update the page whenever a source changes.
Last updated: June 11, 2026.
Primary sources from Thumbtack's help center and pro community. Note: Thumbtack's help articles are JavaScript-rendered, so search engines may show stale snippets. The community forum is the most current source for active policy changes.
45-day refund window, manual refund categories, refunds applied as account credit.
Refund request workflow and timing (24–48 hours, up to 4 days for complex cases).
The Thumbtack Numbers forwarding/masking system rolled out in mid-2026.
June 2026 community confirmation of the ~10% lead-price increase tied to the Thumbtack Numbers rollout and the 72-hour automatic refund.
May 11, 2026 announcement thread for the Thumbtack Numbers rollout.
Thumbtack-staffed Q&A thread on the Numbers rollout.
Includes the Thumbtack moderator statement that non-responsive customers alone are not refund-eligible under the standard 6-category process.
The 2024 expansion of the Instant Book cancellation refund to a 1-hour window during 8am–8pm local time.
The 5-minute / 100× / 21× figures all trace to one 2007 study by Dr. James Oldroyd (Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University) sponsored by InsideSales.com. Harvard Business Review restated the data in 2011. The study is frequently misattributed to MIT or to HBR as primary research — neither attribution is correct.
HBR restatement of the 2007 Lead Response Management Study.
Canonical summary of the 2007 Oldroyd / InsideSales.com study — the source of the 100× contact-rate and 21× qualification-rate findings.
3,211-campaign dataset (April 2024 – March 2025). Source of cross-trade $90.92 median and category medians: HVAC $127.74, plumbing $129.02, painting $138.38, general contracting $165.67, roofing $228.15, handyman $54.05.
When we cite ServiceTitan figures, we cite their "call booking rate" — the share of calls converted to scheduled jobs — not a "first-responder close rate." Different metric than what some marketing summaries label it.
Plumbing 43% / HVAC 38% / Electrical 41% call booking rates. Reported by ServiceTitan from their platform data (originally published June 2022).
When we compare Tack Tools Pro to other lead-response tools, the prices we cite come from each vendor’s public pricing page on the date of publication. Pricing changes; always verify on the vendor’s site before making a purchase decision.
Starter plan $60/month, Enterprise plan $500/month. "Under two minutes" response time per Thumbtack’s own marketing.
Essential $229/mo, Growth $399/mo, Scale $629/mo, $299 one-time onboarding fee.
Lead caps: Essential 150/mo, Growth 300/mo.
Quote-based; public range cited by third-party reviews is roughly $99–$199/month.
ClientTether’s own published response-time claim is "30 seconds or less."
No public pricing page; Capterra user reviews indicate roughly $700–$900/month based on real-world reports. Upper bounds vary by deal.
Yelp uses a cost-per-click (CPC) ad model — current entry tier is around $150/month flat. The "Request a Quote" feature is free; there is no per-source lead fee.
Tack Tools Pro publishes operational metrics from our own platform. These are not third-party verified, but every number we report is queryable inside our own database, and we date-stamp them so readers can see when each measurement was taken.
570 leads processed, 97.5% automation rate, 1.2-second median start latency, 34.6% live-bridge rate.
Single-business pre/post comparison of automated lead response on Thumbtack.
The "78% of customers hire the first business that responds" statistic widely cited across marketing content traces to a vendor survey by LeadConnect, not a peer-reviewed study. We've removed it from our blog where it appeared. The 5-minute-response findings (100× contact rate, 21× qualification rate) come from the 2007 Lead Response Management Study by Dr. James Oldroyd and InsideSales.com — not from MIT, and not from independent HBR research. We've corrected attribution everywhere we cite these numbers.